🙏 With the Divine Blessings of Bhagwan Shri Krishna, We Continue Our Dharma Karya 🙏 Our humble belief is that every matter concerning Dharma deserves to be pursued with sincerity, patience and perseverance, using lawful means until it reaches its logical conclusion. Filing a complaint is only the beginning, consistent follow-up and the pursuit of appropriate legal remedies are equally important. By the grace of Bhagwan Shri Krishna, some of the outcomes of our collective efforts in the service of Dharma include: 1. Rana Ayyub - FIR registered pursuant to court orders. 2. Karishma Aziz - FIR registered pursuant to court orders. 3. Dhruv Rathee - Video withheld in India. 4. Nikhil Wagle - Posts deleted and public apology tendered. 5. Retd. Supreme Court Judge Markandey Katju - Post deleted and public apology tendered. 6. Mrs. Sudha Murty - Post deleted following a legal notice. 7. Big Cash Poker - Advertisement featuring Nawazuddin Siddiqui removed from all social media platforms pursuant to a GAC order in our appeal. 8. M. F. Husain's paintings depicting Bhagwan Ganesha and Bhagwan Hanuman in a derogatory manner- Seized from an art gallery's exhibition pursuant to an order of the learned Magistrate. 9. Nishu Azad - X account suspended. 10. Fact Vid - Facebook account suspended. 11. Heaven to Earth - Derogatory posts removed from its Facebook page. 12. Mrinal Pande - X post withheld pursuant to GAC orders. 13. Online content concerning Hindu Women being shown in a derogatory manner - Approximately 529 videos removed and 50 YouTube channels banned following proceedings before the Delhi High Court. 14. Walmart - Offensive posts concerning Hindu Deities removed following a legal notice issued by us. These are only some of the matters we have pursued. Approximately 30 cases are currently pending before different Courts and are being diligently pursued. Each matter presents its own challenges, and we remain committed to following the due process of law until the appropriate outcomes are achieved. We share these developments not to claim credit or take pride in ourselves, but to reaffirm our faith that sincere efforts, perseverance and the pursuit of Dharma through lawful means can bring meaningful results. There remains much work to be done. We express our heartfelt gratitude to Sr. Adv. Makarand D. Adkar Ji (@AdkarMakarand) for his constant support, invaluable guidance and encouragement in this journey. His guidance continues to strengthen our resolve to pursue these matters with sincerity, patience and commitment. We consider ourselves merely instruments in the service of Dharma. Whatever little we have been able to contribute is possible only through the divine grace of Bhagwan Shri Krishna, the guidance of our seniors and the support of everyone who stands with us in this journey. Our endeavour is not to seek recognition, but to fulfil our duty with humility, sincerity and unwavering faith. We pray for the strength and wisdom to continue this Sewa without ego or expectation, always keeping Dharma above ourselves. May Bhagwan Shri Krishna continue to guide us on the path of Dharma and grant us the strength to serve with humility and devotion. Jai Shri Krishna! 🙏 Jai Sanatan Dharma!

In the Giggle v Tickle case, the sex discrimination commissioner argued that men who claim to be women need pregnancy protections in law against potential discrimination. This was specifically used as a mechanism to establish that men who claim to be women are women in law. An insane claim, because they’re men & therefore can’t become pregnant. I don’t think for a second she is talking about actual women here 👇 But if she is, it means she is now confirming that the accurate definition of woman still exists in the sex discrimination act, within the pregnancy & motherhood protections, which is exactly what we argued for 4.5 years & the SDC said was wrong, demanding that the ordinary meaning of woman includes men who claim to be women. If the accurate definition of woman does exist within one part of the SDA, it means it exists in all of it, because unless specifically advised otherwise, words cannot be read to have different or conflicting meanings in law. There is no such instruction within the SDA.

#Soon... There #WillBeDoom....