Check out our latest in @JAMA_current characterizing the use of @OpenEvidence among nearly 1 million clinician users ja.ma/4Ba9ej2
2
8
26
1,965
Thanks to a very talented co-first author @IAmSamFin, and guidance from @AnupamBJena and @TravisZack2 @OpenEvidence @LiuMichaelMD @jbrafel @MGBResearchNews @harvardmed
3
104
US pilots and flight attendants had the highest and second-highest percentages of deaths from radiation-related #Cancer across 503 occupations, while deaths from other cancers were not similarly elevated. ja.ma/4wDT520
1
6
17
3,827
Huge congratulations to @vrpatel97 on being named a 2026 @statnews Wunderkind! Nobody is better at spotting the natural experiments hiding in everyday life, and turning them into rigorous science. Nobody more deserving! statnews.com/wunderkinds/vis…
3
10
559
Check out our latest in @JAMAPsych showing that traffic fatalities transiently rise after mass shootings. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam…
1
4
4
750
On the day immediately following the 10 largest mass shooting events over a 15 year study period, traffic fatalities rose by an average of 14.3% compared to the preceding days, corresponding to 19.9 additional deaths across the country.
1
123
The toll of mass shootings reaches well beyond the immediate victims. Grief, distraction, and acute stress may impair driving in the days that follow... a form of collateral harm that rarely enters public accounting. Team: @AnupamBJena @LiuMichaelMD @ChrisWorsham
1
76
Vishal Patel retweeted
New: a large, blinded evaluation study by a consortium from Stanford, Harvard, UCSF, University of Washington, and the lead statistical editor at JAMA, on the accuracy of OpenEvidence vs foundation models for real point-of-care clinical queries. - Gold-standard expert subspecialist evaluation: Rather than relying on models rating other models, 149 clinicians from >30 specialties subspecialty-matched to each question evaluated accuracy, blinded. - OE outperformed foundation models on accuracy, utility, source quality, and verifiability; this holds whether raters had used OpenEvidence before or not. - After OE, Gemini and Claude perform statistically similarly to each other, and each of Claude and Gemini significantly outperforms GPT5.5. Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2606.28960 All code and data including raw queries and answers were publicly released by the authors.
For the past two weeks, our independent team of statisticians, AI evaluation experts, clinical AI researchers, and clinicians was given a unique opportunity to test one question: “How well do different AI tools answer user questions on the OpenEvidence (OE) platform?”
13
42
226
73,340
Vishal Patel retweeted
Today we are sharing the results on arXiv and the benchmark dataset on HuggingFace. Following our prespecified statistical analysis, OE scored highest on all five dimensions of accuracy, clinical utility, source quality, verifiability, and completeness.
1
2
3
755
Check out our latest paper in @JAMA_current, showing that suicide mortality was lower than expected following the launch of the "988" Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.
1
8
57
14,696
Suicide mortality among 15- to 34-year-olds was 11% lower than expected. States with the largest increases in answered 988 calls had larger reductions in suicide mortality (~18%), while those with the smallest increases had smaller reductions (~10%).
1
291
Led by @vrpatel97 and @AnupamBJena in @JAMA_current, we find that suicide deaths among young adults declined 📉 by 11% in the US after the launch of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline📲 - supporting efforts to preserve and expand crisis services. Link: jamanetwork.com/journals/jam…
1
7
32
8,410
Led by @vrpatel97 in @AnnalsofIM, we show that physicians are more likely to die at home or hospice than others. However, modest gaps suggest that even medical knowledge and familiarity with serious illness are not the principal drivers of end-of-life care acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/…
6
13
2,385