Time to answer the question: What can an early-November Polar Vortex collapse (SSW) do to Winter 2026/2027? 🧵👇
These maps are not a forecast or actual temperatures. They show the DIFFERENCE between winters with an early-November collapse and winters without one, in the same El Niño+wQBO setup.
Since there is no real observational data with such an early SSW and nino/QBO combo, I decided to look for data in two independent model sets:
🔹 Climate models (CMIP6, 80 runs): 32 model winters with an early collapse vs. 565 without. All of them with a strong El Niño + westerly QBO, like this year.
🔹 ECMWF SEAS5 seasonal forecast hindcast (1981–2024): 109 forecast members with a collapse vs 444 without. Each is compared only with the other members of the same forecast, so the ocean and El Niño/QBO are identical.
Why 32 vs 565 is ok in the climate models: the big group is the baseline, or the normal El Niño winter without a collapse, as all are the same base state of strong Niño+wQBO, not random winters. It is supposed to look "average", and subtracting it leaves only what the collapse adds. The small group only makes the result noisier, which is why the dots mark where the difference is statistically significant.
December is where both agree:
🇺🇸 Central & Eastern US 1–3 °F colder, while northern Canada around Hudson Bay runs milder
🇪🇺 Scandinavia & NE Europe 1–2 °C colder, with high pressure to the north and lower pressure over the Atlantic
After December, the signal weakens. The climate models fade it out by January. SEAS5 keeps some cold over the central US and over Scandinavia/eastern Europe into January and February.
Bottom line: an early collapse mainly loads the dice for December. It does not lock in a cold winter. But these are just climate simulations, not actual forecasts, as said, only meant to find an underlying signal.
Use these with caution, and do not present them as an actual forecast, as they are not. These show the difference in signal, and if the mean base anomaly is +3, a -1 difference still leaves it at +2, for example.
For phase 2, I am planning to use a larger CMIP6 set, and I am also thinking of making my own custom simulations, as this is a fascinating situation in development.
@judah47 @RyanWeather @webberweather @TWOweather @bam_weather