- Tweets 1,199
- Following 80
- Followers 5,657
- Likes 3,163
While OpenAI has been pursuing internal math proofs and Dots, Anthropic has retaken the lead in terms of coding models (in my opinion). Found myself primarily using Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5 lately instead of Astra.
2,693
If Microsoft can't find ways for its employees to 10x their leverage with AI, even with close ties to OpenAI, then we're definitely in a bubble.
Increased AI use and more PRs does not imply more revenue. Most of the product taste and useful applications of AI are being driven by startups on subscription tiers, yielding an incredibly higher ROI on tokens. Whereas enterprise companies using the API are getting decimated on ROI, as 9-5 employees generate slop at a high cost per token.
Once the corporations figure this out and cut AI spend, where will all of the demand come from?
BREAKING: Microsoft, $MSFT, is offering buyouts to 60,000 workers as part of the company’s efforts to cut costs amid AI adoption, per Bloomberg.
Personnel on select teams in the US, Canada, India, and the UK at a vice president level and below will be eligible.
This reflects ~27% of Microsoft's total workforce.
1
1
404
While working hard is noble, it doesn’t matter in a capitalist society.
What matters is building a product that people are willing to pay for.
Cleary, people are not willing to pay what it truly costs for the current level of intelligence.
5
560
The top one is a complex rule engine. Users enter various constraints and preferences, and the LLM generates a particular output that satisfies those constraints (as well as internal rules and guidelines).
Cost per output token hasn’t decreased much over the past 6 months for models that need decent reasoning capability. And I haven’t seen my internal eval budge much over the past 6 months.
1
51
Benchmarks aside, there are a number of tasks I use OpenAI to execute that have had pretty negligible improvement over the past 6 months.
Obviously coding, design, computer use, and various other tasks have improved significantly, but there remain a variety of tasks that are more complex and nuanced where I’ve seen minimal improvement. Such as complex, dynamic rule engines with language-driven constraints.
Rather than cutting the price of older models, OpenAI seems to release their frontier models at a comparable to increased price as older models (aside from the recent GPT-6 SOL release which I appreciate).
Practically speaking, for tasks that I have found true value in, the price of executing them has not decreased meaningfully over the past six months, even with all of these “cheaper model” claims.
Yes, I’m sure if you averaged it out across coding, computer use, and other things cost efficiency is better. However, it’s still unclear how much of this is slop versus true economic value.
In any case, I hope they can deliver something mind blowing today. Otherwise, it’s hard believe the claims of “more value for the subscription”.
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
2
4
855
AI puzzle design tip: find inspiration from games you love. Then have AI research the game (videos, forums, etc.) to deeply understand how those puzzles work and how they integrate with the environment.
Develop an artistic theme and psychology for your game. Define who your target audience is, how challenging your puzzles should be, and how you imagine them progressing.
Then create a "puzzle master" agent who has all of this context and is responsible for building and maintaining the puzzle quality throughout your game.
Your puzzles will be higher quality and more consistent throughout. And as you playtest and get feedback on your puzzles, the puzzle master can update its context and iterate on the design.
1
5
692
I grew up playing RuneScape, WoW, and WC3. My life has been shaped by video games in many ways.
Opus 5.5 is at the point where it can make my dream of building a game a reality. I can create an experience that I would have never had the time or resources to build.
I will share the journey of building a game with Claude, as well as any learnings or insights I discover along the way. One initial observation: Claude's ability to implement fractal dithering is pretty mind blowing.
My eventual goal is to launch this on Steam as a challenging psychological puzzler. I'm inspired by color, music, and computers - all of which will be part of the experience.
The future is bright!
3
5
928
Does anyone like puzzle adventure games like Myst or The Witness? If so, I'm looking for a few beta testers for a game I'm building. Comment below if you're interested and I'll DM you!
1
2
645
We need to keep moving fast while simultaneously putting more effort into alignment. More people need to evaluate and scrutinize the models
73