The money isn't even being laundered in Ukraine. It's largely destined for UK defence contractors who supply to Ukraine. Zelensky and the UK War Pigs ostensibly work for them. Christopher Harborne's personal wealth has increased by a few £ billion in the last few days. He's been a major funder of Farage and Johnson before him. He owns around 14% of QinetiQ. He also owns quite a few senior civil servants.

UPDATE: The Course of the COUP ATTEMPT by Donald Tusk, supported by the EU‼️ 1. The left-wing Prime Minister Donald Tusk attempted to appoint eight judges to the Constitutional Court, although he was only allowed to appoint three. 2. The right-conservative President Karol Nawrocki administered the oath of office only to three judges, as prescribed by law. 3. Tusk organized a parallel swearing-in for the other five by administering the oath to them himself, although the constitution stipulates that only the president may do this. 4. Nawrocki left the country for a scheduled trip to Senegal. 5. One of the judges illegally sworn in by Tusk ordered the removal of the President of the Court, the right-conservative Bogdan Święczkowski. 6. Tusk ordered the police to block access to the court and thus deny entry to the President of the Supreme Court. 7. Nawrocki interrupted his trip and returned to Poland in haste. 8. In the night to Friday, he personally positioned himself in front of the court building and struggled with the police to gain access. 9. Once he was in the court building, he removed the five judges illegally sworn in by Tusk and granted the President of the Supreme Court access to his office.

For anyone still failing to grasp the sheer gravity of what has unfolded in Poland since yesterday, or who has remained unaware because the mainstream media have conveniently buried the story, leaving social media as virtually the only source of information: Tusk’s government ordered that the presidential aircraft carrying Poland’s Head of State, President Karol Nawrocki, be denied landing clearance. The military pilots, refusing to comply with what they clearly regarded as an unacceptable order, defied the control tower and landed anyway. And what about Brussels? Deafening silence. No outrage, no condemnation, no defence of constitutional order. We all know the routine: the moment the political damage becomes impossible to ignore, the Brussels establishment will rush to Tusk’s defence. After all, he is von der Leyen’s political loyalist, and it is difficult to believe that he would have dared to take such an extraordinary step without the backing ,or at least the approval, of his political patrons. This is not some trivial political spat. These are allegations of an extraordinary abuse of state authority, and they demand immediate answers. Poland deserves the truth, not a wall of silence from Brussels.

Fun fact, Anthropic insiders can dump 10% of their shares on the 1st day of trading. They haven't released the unlock schedule for the remaining 90% because they don't want to spook markets, but I can guarantee when they do it will be horrifying. Anthropic burned $80 billion 1H 2026 for only $16.3 billion in revenue. They have $587 billion in chip and data center purchase commitments and leases. An additional $266 billion in new and amended agreements signed over the preceding four months, including roughly $20 billion with AMD and another $125 billion to $150 billion for Google chips. They have non-cancelable cloud deals with Amazon web services for $110 billion and Google $111 billion. They refused to include the Q3 financial numbers in their preliminary S1 IPO paperwork. Ask yourself why.

The globalist Telegraph’s chief vulgarian, Camilla Scaminey, who has been auditioning to be Kemi’s “press secretary” thinks she can dish it out at me, but crashes out when I give some back. Let the network know what you think of her: gbviews@gbnews.com

That about sums it up:

The BBC is currently running an extended advert for @DaleVince politicised veganism courtesy of Countryfile.

Posting this because Tory HQ is trying to have it scrubbed from the internet 🤫

Six of one...half a dozen of the other. The choice was between Atlanticist Abraham Accord afficianados or Guilty German (Zionist) apparatchiks. The irony is that the Telegraph will now enter an identity crisis because no-one knows what "centre-right" means anymore (because it means nothing). The biggest voting bloc in the United Kingdom - in the developed world - is made up of people who refuse to go along with a political discourse defined by globalists or technocrats.

The current psyop is the thing to keep you arguing. It’s been almost seven years of this for me. Starting with a rapidly formed and extensive network of people who had the moral and intellectual sense to perceive the evil and folly of lockdowns, the first cut was the minority who mistakenly thought that vaccines were the way out. Then it was the morons who didn’t realise that Zelensky was a crappy actor sponsored by a corrupt banker. Then it was all the people who thought October 7 was an exception to the bankers’ wars rule, from both “sides”, really. MAGA/MAHA persuaded a few. Good riddance. The Iran conflict had no impact on the remainder. What I’m left with is a wonderful international network of uncommonly smart and unsurprisingly successful people, but it’s quite a small one.

I can't even. The jokes write themselves. Alex Jones says we must choose the good Antichrist (Elon Musk) over the bad Antichrist (Bill Gates)! 😅😂🤣

BOOM! Rockefeller's EU is evil incarnate: Dickie Sharp on fb: · This is what democracy looks like in the European Union: 📷 Romania: annulled the presidential election after the anti-establishment candidate Georgescu topped the first round. Then he was barred from standing altogether. 📷 Hungary: They introduced term limits counting past service, blocking Viktor Orbán from returning as prime minister. Then they extended these limits to MPs, shutting opponents out of standing at future elections. 📷 Germany: they tried to classify the biggest opposition party, the Alternative for Germany, as “extremist”. Parts of the state still want to shut it down altogether. 📷 France: they upheld Marine Le Pen’s conviction and imposed electronic monitoring. She was eventually allowed to run for the presidency, but only after a tortuous legal battle that tried to stop her from standing altogether. 📷 United Kingdom: politicians postponed local elections. Proposed further delays, then reversed them after legal advice. Pro-EU politicians are now working to overturn the Brexit vote by stealth, pushing to rejoin the European Union and launch an all-out campaign against the anti-establishment Reform UK. 📷 Poland: police have just surrounded the Constitutional Tribunal, with some accusing the EU, Donald Tusk and others of wanting to pack the courts with pro-EU voices. And don’t forget… 📷 Denmark, 1992: voters rejected the pro-EU Maastricht treaty. Opt-outs are negotiated. But then another referendum follows in 1993. This time, the original vote is overturned. 📷 Ireland, 2001: voters reject the Nice treaty. Neutrality assurances follow. Another referendum in 2002. This time, the original vote is overturned. 📷 Ireland, 2008: voters reject the Lisbon treaty. Legal guarantees follow. Another referendum in 2009. This time, the original vote is overturned. 📷📷 France and the Netherlands, 2005: voters reject the EU Constitution. That treaty dies. But most of its reforms return through the Lisbon treaty, ratified without another vote. 📷 Greece, 2015: 61% of people reject bailout terms. Days later, their government agrees to a new bailout requiring further austerity. All of these things happened. Here’s my question: who protects the voters when the very politicians who claim to “defend democracy” decide that it is the voters who are the problem?

They also want 🇵🇱 Poland's gold, because they're the only European country who hoarding gold anticipating the European sovereign debt crisis. They don't want any European nation to survive what's coming because they want a European fiscal union to match its monetary union.

In spite of all the evidence, many people still believe there was an actual pandemic in 2020.

“I studied law. I reject the Gaza genocide accusation” might be one of the most absurd sentences ever written. Studying law does not automatically make your opinion worthy of consideration. I also studied law— and have practiced for 15 years— and see ample evidence of genocide. Along with many other people who “studied law.” That opinion, by the way, is shared by every reputable human rights organization.

Nigel is a fake as Rupert. He supports war because the Christopher Harbourne, who gives Nigel millions to fund his lifestyle & lends him his private jet and pilot, owns a 15% stake in a U.K. defence company Qinetiq, whose share price soars with war. We see 👀 him.

The uniparty hates beer drinkers and pubs.

Great video from Cleverly explaining why a Pint in London is so expensive... Only downside is he thinks he is describing Labour policies, but he is actually describing all of the awful policies under the last Tory government that originally led to this price.

My favorite part of this “gentle mauling by a dead sheep” from @ConorBurnsUK is this paragraph. It’s mostly to do with Burns’s personal gripe with me, because I refused to be part of his creepy coalition of Conservative Future activists back in the day. Many would do well to recall the Tatler Tory scandal and the death of Elliot Johnson. Burns was an integral part of that crowd. He’s right. I didn’t like him. But the other part he gets correct here is my deep unhappiness. I am deeply, deeply unhappy with the state of the country. A state his party left the nation in. A status quo uniparty revolving door of grifters and liars and dare I say scammers who have no contrition about their record in government and now feel entitled to have another go. One recently selected Tory candidate said he wants to get back into parliament to “finish the job he started.” Uh, no thanks. We saw how well you lot did that job and I suspect many many people are as UNHAPPY about it as I remain.

Francisco d'Anconia's speech on money in Atlas Shrugged is the most economically literate passage in twentieth-century fiction. The speech runs about 2,000 words in the novel. Francisco delivers it at a party, surrounded by parasites who just declared money the root of all evil. He corrects them with surgical precision. Money is not the root of evil. It is the tool that makes voluntary exchange possible, the ledger of honest production, the only mechanism by which you trade your mind's output for someone else's. The core claim is this: money requires production. You cannot print your way to wealth any more than you can vote yourself a harvest. Every dollar bill in your wallet represents a claim on someone's actual labor, actual material, actual time. The moment a government prints currency without corresponding production, it dilutes every existing claim. It robs you quietly, without a gun visible in the room. Francisco puts it cleanly: "Money is a tool of exchange, which can't exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them." That sentence alone dismantles three centuries of mercantilist confusion. Wealth is production. Currency is merely the signal that coordinates its exchange. The speech also destroys the "love of money is greed" cliché. Francisco distinguishes between those who earn money through trade and those who acquire it through force or fraud. A man who builds a railroad and charges willing passengers operates on an entirely different moral plane from a lobbyist who gets a competitor regulated out of existence. Rand drew that line in 1957. Washington D.C. has spent the intervening 69 years blurring it. What the speech predicts is decay. When a society starts treating producers as servants of non-producers, capital goes quiet. Factories don't get built. Entrepreneurs stop announcing their plans. You see this in every hyperinflationary episode, from Weimar Germany in 1923 to Zimbabwe in 2008 to Argentina today, still fighting inflation. Production retreats when the rewards of production get expropriated. Read the speech slowly. Exchange requires two parties who each gain something. Force produces one winner and one loser, and eventually the loser stops playing. The whole global economic order rests on which model you choose to enforce.