I’ll take the risk of believing this is a genuine question:
Of course I condemn attacks on Christians in Taybeh. And beyond condemning them, I want to say something more personal: it genuinely pains me to see Christian families living in fear, and their sense of security violated.
Violence against innocent people, their homes and property is disgraceful, whether the victims are Christians, Muslims or Jews. Those responsible must be held accountable. Israel’s Foreign Minister, Gideon Sa’ar, said precisely that just days ago.
As Israel's Special Envoy to the Christian World, part of my responsibility is to help ensure that Christians in Israel and across the region, including Taybeh, can live in safety, dignity and freedom. It may come as a shock to some, but not everything we do to achieve that gets published on X. Much of the important work happens away from the cameras.
But since you raise Taybeh, there is something interesting about this case that deserves attention.
In October 2025, the municipality and residents of Taybeh turned to Israel’s Supreme Court, seeking protection against trespassers and safe access to their lands.
Following that petition, the Israeli military complied with their request and issued a closed military zone order intended to restrict entry by outsiders, including Israelis, and protect the village.
Think about what that means. Palestinian Christians sought protection from Israeli extremists by appealing to the Israeli Supreme Court. And the Israeli military subsequently complied with Taybeh’s residents’ request.
Does that mean the problem is solved? Of course not. The continuing violence proves otherwise. And we must do more to prevent attacks and bring perpetrators to justice. No ifs or buts.
But surely the existence of these legal remedies and a willingness to act, are facts worth acknowledging?
Yet in your posts, you presented the military order as an Israeli measure against the Christians of Taybeh, without explaining the petition that preceded it. You also suggested in your post that Israel was trying to conceal what was happening by excluding journalists, although accredited journalists are generally exempt from such restrictions.
And herein lies the problem. There is a perfectly legitimate case to be made against extremist violence. I make that case myself. But when even an Israeli measure intended to protect Palestinian Christians is presented as evidence of Israeli hostility toward Christians, one has to wonder: Is there anything Israel could do that would not be interpreted as proof of its guilt?
If you were simply unaware of the facts, that’s understandable. I’m happy to DM and exchange information directly when needed. I believe that you sincerely care about our community.
But if you knew, or learned the facts and chose not to correct the record, then the question is no longer whether I condemn violence against Christians. It is whether you are willing to acknowledge facts that complicate your narrative.
And that, Ihab, is what a genuinely honest conversation requires.