The chief benefit from rising atmospheric CO₂ levels is an undeniable increase in planetary green leaf cover, now clearly visible from space. This fresh greening covers an area twice the size of the continental United States - yet it remains ignored by the institutional forces driving a narrative of climate emergency, and largely overlooked in the mainstream media. Data from NASA’s MODIS satellite instruments tells the real story. Rather than triggering global collapse, the rise in CO₂ sparked a massive expansion in the green canopy, stimulating agricultural yields (some cereal crops up by 280%) and natural ecosystems alike. This 'CO₂ fertilisation effect' occurs as plants perform photosynthesis more efficiently while losing less water through their stomata. Meanwhile, the global economy has been severely disrupted by a 40-year campaign built on forecasts of environmental doom from anthropogenic CO₂. This trace gas is not a climate control knob. It is the fundamental driver of biological photosynthesis and oxygen production. These campaigns, led by UN activism, demand a rapid, forced transition away from hydrocarbon energy. Yet wind and solar cannot supply the dense baseload power required for steel production and heavy industry. Hydrocarbon fuels still provide 82% of global primary power. This entire transition is justified under the warning that CO₂ emissions are leading the planet to the brink of catastrophe - with the total cost of this pointless pivot estimated at a staggering $275 trillion. Earth's geological history, paired with empirical satellite data, reveal a completely different reality: CO₂ is a powerful agent of biological enrichment. Its capacity to drive runaway global warming faces steep, immovable physical limitations. A critical pillar of atmospheric physics is how the warming effect of CO₂ continually reduces along a sliding logarithmic curve. The first 100 ppm of CO₂ exert the greatest impact on capturing outgoing infrared radiation. But as concentrations rise, absorption bands rapidly saturate. Each subsequent doubling of CO₂ yields an ever-smaller increment of radiative warmth. The concept of a runaway warming feedback loop loses its theoretical foundation under actual atmospheric conditions, where the 'rate of warming' diminishes progressively. Yet this debunked narrative is routinely recycled to fuel panic. Annual COP climate summits over the past thirty years also endlessly amplify this agenda of fear, functioning largely as high-end junkets for global elites. In geological terms, atmospheric CO₂ is in long-term decline - a fact carefully airbrushed from IPCC worst-case scenarios. During the Cambrian period, atmospheric CO₂ peaked as high as 7,000 ppm. Even with those immense concentrations, there was no global boiling; instead, it marked the greatest explosion of biological diversity in Earth's history. During the Last Glacial Maximum (26,000 to 19,000 years ago), CO₂ levels plummeted to roughly 180 ppm - dangerously close to the 150 ppm threshold below which most C3 plant life starves and dies. From a long-term evolutionary perspective, modern levels hovering above 420 ppm represent a vital, partial recovery from a geologically recent carbon drought, rather than a precursor to apocalypse. Today’s global average temperature sits at approximately 15°C. In the context of the history of complex life on land, this is remarkably cold. Earth’s baseline historical temperature average was closer to 24°C, characterised by ice-free poles and expansive, highly productive ecosystems. Our current global average actually reflects a colder-than-average ice age regime. Global climates are not controlled by trace gases. They are driven by massive, slow-moving astronomical, oceanic, and tectonic forces - such as Milankovitch orbital cycles or the shifting configuration of continents blocking equatorial ocean currents.

On Zelensky’s orders, live ammunition was fired at ordinary, unarmed civilians.

It's a great question. Here is my answer I don't give a fuck about my net worth. I have enough. My family has enough. My next dollar can impact other people's lives a lot more than mine. That's why we started CostPlusDrugs com That's why I did Shark Tank for 15 years. That is what drives my investments I look for ways to have an impact. I pay my taxes. I don't care about moving up on the Forbes 400

Wireless Health Risks: FCC Docket 13-84 Submissions Now Available Electromagnetic Radiation Safety, Nov 2, 2026 My latest post provides access to and highlights key submissions: saferemr.com/2026/11/public-…

CBC’s Karina Roman is still running cover for Carney’s accounting trick She notes he “announced the government’s operational budget will be balanced a year early” (no plan for the capital side), flags that the PBO says interest on the debt is the government’s fastest-growing expense, then ends with the government’s preferred closer: “Still, the government says now is the time for ambition and that it will pay off in the end.” The “operating budget” is a new Carney invention. It lets Ottawa reclassify large amounts of spending, tax credits, and subsidies as “capital” (broader than other advanced countries or standard public accounting, per the PBO) so they can claim the day-to-day books are balancing while overall deficits stay huge and debt interest keeps climbing CBC treats the new vocabulary fiction as natural framing and gives the government’s spin the last word. That’s not reporting. That’s CBC stenography @karinaroman1 @brodiefenlon

Dr. Jill Malone just revealed a statistic the media will never tell you. “Children who grow up drinking raw milk have about 30% less allergies and asthma.” And the true risks associated with it are far smaller than you think. “There are about 1,000 cases of salmonella or listeria infections annually in the United States.” “Those are acute infections… from drinking raw milk.” “And one can protect themselves by making sure that the facilities are sanitary, making sure that the farmer’s doing the proper testing.” “On the other hand… we have millions of children in the United States.” “A vast number of them have allergies and asthma.” “It’s one of the leading childhood diseases.” “What if those children were all drinking raw milk?” “What if we saw a 10 or 20% decrease in allergies and asthma?” “What would that [benefit] look like versus the risk of salmonella and listeria, which is actually a very small risk because you have 1,000 cases?” “There’s this risk-benefit analysis that our public health officials don’t do and won’t even consider.” “There really could be huge benefits from drinking raw milk.” “This needs to be… analyzed and studied.” @RWMaloneMD @JillGMalonePhD

The NSW government has now apologized to parents for jabbing (unnecessarily) their teenage kids without informed consent. @OkayThenNews

Thank you, Shane Getson @ShaneCGetson, for your years of service to the people of Lac Ste. Anne-Parkland and to all of Alberta. We wish him and his family all the very best in the next chapter.