Real tough one for ITK cartel content creators right now. They know Jackson is out but have to pretend they don't. Do they start him with a good first sub? Or risk the ire of the community by removing/benching him. Don't envy them.

Jackson out then according to the leaked content creators group chats. It’s shit like this that makes this game toxic.

James Blunts face when he realises he’s somehow just banished himself… #celebritytraitors

Our ruling class are telling us that after fifteen years of wage stagnation and rising prices, we have to have another decade of the same. We are the fifth largest economy on earth. If there is no money left, where has it gone?

I'm fucking tired of Russians trying to pretend to be the victims in this war. Russia invaded Ukraine, bombed its cities, murdered civilians, and destroyed entire cities! You can't cry victim here

Alexei Navalny was the man Putin feared most. He was a lawyer with a YouTube channel who showed Russians exactly how their leaders were robbing them. Russia poisoned him, jailed him and killed him in an Arctic prison. He was 47. 🧵

A man who loves Britain so much he travels on an Irish passport, benefiting from the EU citizenship rights he campaigned for Britain to leave behind. And let's not forget his 2013 prison sentence for using someone else's passport to bypass US immigration controls. Apparently, borders and immigration laws are sacred, unless Tommy Robinson finds them inconvenient. irishtimes.com/politics/2024… the-independent.com/news/uk/…

After yesterday’s post about the Russell Brand trial, my inbox was flooded with people claiming this is all just a coordinated media conspiracy. Well, I hope those same people actually read what came out of Southwark Crown Court today, because Brand took the witness stand and completely shredded his own defense. Under cross-examination, he openly admitted to "inconsistencies" in his evidence, awkwardly asking the prosecution for forgiveness. Even more damning, his own barrister asked him if a single friend or colleague from twenty-five years in showbusiness was willing to stand up in that courtroom and speak for his character. His answer was no. Not a single person would touch him with a barge pole. Think about what that actually means. Decades surrounded by entourages, agents, and industry friends, and not one human being is willing to take an oath on his behalf. Then look at how he described women to the jury today. He admitted saving a complainant’s name in his phone labeled with a degrading slur and a sexual act. When asked if a woman expressed reluctance to an encounter, he casually dismissed her hesitation as "coquettishness and coyness." This is not a misunderstood free-thinker being silenced for his politics. This is an arrogant narcissist who used celebrity status to treat women like disposable commodities, and is now watching his carefully rehearsed narrative crumble under basic legal scrutiny. Stop falling for the staged internet guru act. The admissions coming out of his own mouth in that courtroom tell you everything you need to know.

Didn’t take the flu vaccine, Unwell for ten days and counting with flu, Blames flu vaccine 😂

24 years in the Marines taught me that being ready for emergencies is always a good idea. Here is what to include in your kit to get through 3 days. Everyone's situation is different, so check what you might need 👇 beready.campaign.gov.uk

Anyone defending Tommy Robinson needs to explain exactly what they think he should be allowed to get away with. A man who claims to be a great British patriot, lives in Spain and spends the majority of the year on holiday at the expense of his “donors” was sitting in a holiday resort in Cyprus while stirring up civil unrest in Britain. Journalists reported on it. That is their job. It was a legitimate national story. And because Robinson didn’t like the scrutiny, he sent private investigators after the journalists, had them tracked and photographed, exposed their home addresses and their families, and threatened to turn up at their homes, saying “I’m coming to get you”. One journalist needed personal security. Another had to remove his family from their home. If you believe that is acceptable behaviour, that a man can threaten journalists and expose their families to intimidation simply because he dislikes their reporting, then you aren’t defending free speech. You’re defending intimidation. A jury heard the evidence and convicted him. Stop pretending this was a conspiracy because you don’t like the verdict.

🚨🇬🇧 They say, “Tommy was protecting his family.” “They did it to him first.” Two excuses. A jury heard and rejected both. The Mail wrote about a public figure on holiday. Tommy hired private investigators to photograph journalists’ homes, then told a million followers “I will find you.” That isn’t the same thing. And it isn’t protection. Here’s what the jury actually heard. What happened In August 2024, while England was rioting, Robinson was on holiday in Cyprus, posting about the riots to his followers. The Mail found him there and ran a story: “Stoking riots from his sunbed.” Over the next three days he went after the two reporters, Jacob Dirnhuber and Andrew Young. 🔺5 August: a direct message to Dirnhuber. “I’ll be knocking at your door.” 🔺5 August: a phone call to Young. Robinson told him he’d be coming to his home and that he’d “have to move house.” 🔺6 August: a post naming Dirnhuber, saying he and the other Mail journalists had “today been located.” 🔺7 August: a video to around a million followers. He said he had details of where they and their families lived. He told them to abide by “men’s rules.” Then: “The men, on the other hand, I will find you.” He also hired private investigators to photograph their homes. He admitted it in court. The result: Dirnhuber moved house. Young was given a close protection officer. The law The charge was harassment causing fear of violence. The prosecution had to prove a course of conduct that made each man fear violence on at least two occasions, and that Robinson knew or ought to have known it would. That last part is an objective test. What Robinson says he meant doesn’t decide it. What decides it is what a reasonable person would expect a million followers to do with “I will find you.” His defence He said he was protecting his family. That is a real defence in law, if the conduct is reasonable for protecting someone. Police had given him four threat-to-life warnings. The jury heard all of it. Why it failed He admitted the aim was pressure. Telling a million people where journalists live doesn’t protect your children. It endangers theirs. 🔺He didn’t dispute that they were frightened. Asked in evidence, he said no. 🔺He never complained to the press regulator. He never asked the Mail to change or remove the story. The legal route was there. He skipped it. 🔺His own words. “Men’s rules” is not the language of protection. One is journalism, however much you dislike it. The other is a threat. The jury He chose this. At the magistrates’ court he was offered a trial there. He opted for a jury instead, saying he wanted 12 members of the British public to hear the evidence. They did. They convicted on both counts. Sentencing is on 16 December.

Rupert Lowe and half the right spent weeks calling David Lammy and Kier Starmer corrupt for even looking at the jury system. Same jury system just convicted Tommy Robinson. Suddenly it’s a stitch-up. You don’t care about juries. You care about being permanently aggrieved. Pick a fucking side.

Badenoch has forgotten that Thatcher sold off the family silver, Cameron ruined public services with austerity, Johnson ruined the economy for a generation with his Brexit deal. Then he pissed £billions up the wall with dodgy Covid loans and PPE contracts. Then we had Mad Lizzy!

The same rape victims that Tommy Robinson piggybacked on to build his empire of wealth. He has done absolutely fuck all to help survivors of the grooming gang scandal, other than use their suffering to fund his jobless, millionaire lifestyle.

Lucy Connolly thinks the Daily Mail, the paper that has spent decades hammering immigration, the EU and “woke” culture, is a left-leaning rag contributing to a “communist dystopia.” That’s how far gone she is.👇👇👇

"These days you can't even threaten journalists without the courts getting involved. Insane."

NEWS! Patriots furious after British justice system applies British laws to British man in Britain newsthump.com/2026/10/28/pat…

"The system has treated him unfairly." He chose a jury trial. He said he wanted "12 members of the British public" to hear the evidence. They heard it for 11 hours and convicted him on both counts. That's not the system. That's the public.

Is this the best WC for gameweek 9? Starting with the defense 🔴2x Arsenal - Still proving to be one of the best defences in Europe with 5 clean sheets. Double up is non-negotiable. 🦢2x Brighton - Vuskovic (50% defcon hit-rate and 6th among defenders for XG) - De Cuyper (5 attacking returns and playing LW) - 5 clean sheets each 🍒Silva - Highest Defcon hit-rate in the game (75%) - 5th for XG among defenders - Top of the fixture ticker in the next 6 🛡️Muharemovic - 62.5% defcon hit-rate - Leeds have only conceded 6 goals (1 behind Arsenal) - 2 assist this season (2 goals for Brighton outside the league) Midfield/Forwards below👇